Showing posts with label Harry White. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry White. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Exhibit Aphorisms Too (and a GIVEAWAY!)



Harry White has recently introduced his second card deck of exhibit aphorisms and was kind enough to share some thoughts about "Aphorisms Too" with ExhibiTricks readers.



What are exhibit aphorisms and what are they for?
In 1996 Techniquest started the UK’s first Master’s course in Science Communication based in a Science Centre.  It was a great success with students from all around the world, and graduates were quickly snapped up by science centres.  I taught the Exhibit Development module but, after a year of PowerPointing the students into submission, I felt that it just wasn’t appropriate to teach a degree about informal education, formally.  

“Power corrupts, PowerPoint corrupts absolutely”

Also, whenever I ran out of material for a session, just saying something deliberately controversial would start a debate that would fill the time and engage the students.  So, I started collecting these quotations, jokes, and provocations as aphorisms and put 52 of the best/most annoying onto a deck of cards.  When the sessions flagged, I’d ask someone to pick a card, read it out and then the group would try and fathom what I was getting at.  Most times a heated debate would ensue and my session would go like a charm.

More recently I have used them in consulting with developing science centres around the world. In this circumstance, I started adding quotations from other people in the industry and this has extended the repertoire considerably. But as many of these are well known I have kept them to a minimum of essential ones in the card deck. 

The idea of an Aphorism is to put some core truth in a memorably flippant way so that people who are “in the know” recognise it and those who don’t, think about it.  As an instructional tool, this has a fatal flaw in that anyone who “gets” it doesn’t need it, and those that need it, don’t get it. 

But aphorisms are memorable and anti-intuitive, a bit like a good exhibit.

Also, an omitted Aphorism is that:

 “As soon as you print a pack of Aphorism Cards, lots of new, better, more meaningful Aphorisms will be found”


After printing 3 batches of the original Aphorisms card deck, I realised that with 900 packs in circulation, someone must be taking it seriously, or there are a vast number of wobbly desks needing something under one leg out there. So, I felt that I should make some minor corrections for this batch. For instance, originally the Joker Aphorism was: 

“A Consultant is a man who borrows your watch and then charges to tell you the time” 

and I was that man! But in reality, there are plenty of consultants of both genders and so now I am an equal opportunities insulter. 

The first pack of Aphorisms drew from a long list, built up over many years, and naturally I included the ones that I thought were best. In the time since the first "Exhibit Aphorisms" deck was published, I collected even more aphorisms. I did consider combining the first set with the newly collected ones but then which would I leave out? And so, I embarked on the second card set, "Aphorisms Too."

And so, this second batch of “quotations, jokes, and provocations” is perhaps a little less flippant, but it does still try and look at Science Centre life with humour. It is less focused on exhibits than the previous set, reflecting my developing practice in the creation of Science Centres and Children’s Museums over the intervening years.


Here are a few examples from the Aphorisms Too deck with commentary:






Ace of Spades
Pizzey’s Pint Index of Exhibit Excellence 

1 to 3 pints
Standard to good ideas 

3 to 8 pints
Great ideas that could change the world 

Over 8 pints 
Brilliant ideas that definitely will change the world, if you can remember what they were. 

I remember meeting Steve in a pub near the Science Museum in London and after a very productive exhibit brainstorm we came up with this aphorism and I wrote it in my notebook. Many years later when I was putting this second batch of Aphorisms together, I asked Steve if he minded if I used this and attributed it to him. He didn’t remember the Aphorism at all, which by applying “Pizzey’s Pint Index of Exhibit Excellence” recursively means it must be a really great Aphorism.

There is another, less relevant, anecdote about this “exhibit ideas” session. Steve and I had both been to a pitching session for a new gallery at the Science Museum and as we were leaving Steve wanted to show me his latest toy, a GPS device, which in these pre-smartphone days was pretty cutting-edge stuff. “Look and type in "Pubs Nearby" and immediately it shows me the nearest. So, we set off for the “Hoop and Toy” following the directions from Steve’s device. I expressed my admiration for the technology and Steve said, ”But you haven’t heard the best bit yet! In order to get all the pubs programmed into the device, you have to visit each one and register its location.” You have to go on a pub crawl to enable future pub crawls!





Ace of Hearts
“Playing with clay makes no pots, playing with clay makes potters”

This was the Aphorism that meant I had to make a second pack. It is so good and sums up what we do, it answers all the “But are they learning anything?” complaints perfectly.







2 Hearts
The “Allo, Allo” theory of learning

Loose Objects (LO) = Learning Outcomes (LO)

Simon Nicholson


“Allo, Allo” is an old British comedy programme, it caricatures British attitudes to the Second World War and is a pastiche which includes some pretty dated ideas of comedy, that would not be “PC” nowadays, but it is fondly remembered.

The more loose objects there are in an educational toy, the more degrees of freedom, and the more potential there is for learning. When I was a boy, Lego bricks came in red or white and had 2, 4, or 8 spots; I could build anything my imagination could conceive, and I did, planes, rockets, houses, submarines for mice (best forgotten!). With modern sets the parts are so specific you can only build the DeathStar.

In 1971, Simon Nicholson wrote an article in a Landscape Architecture journal called "How NOT to Cheat Children – The Theory of Loose Parts"


A pile of sand is almost the ultimate experiential learning experience, no wonder kids like the beach.

There is a quote from William Gibson’s book, All Tomorrow’s Parties:

“That which is overdesigned, too highly specific, anticipates outcome; the anticipation of outcome guarantees, if not failure, the absence of grace.”







Ace of Clubs
Safety Engineering

One bad accident could close your centre forever.

If you have 100 exhibits with 100,000 Visitors per annum, there are 10 million visitor/exhibit interactions per year

 So, a “one in a million chance” gives almost an accident every month


When working with the staff of Science or Engineering based companies, or universities, often the creation of exhibits based on their technologies is viewed by that staff as “making toys”. 
One prototype of a jointly-developed exhibit had a giant “Train Points”-style lever with a sprung return which, when released, hammered into the heavy brass surround, it was a thing of beauty and a deadly finger guillotine. 

The co-developers tended to dismiss my concerns, ”No one would be silly enough to put their finger in there” etc. I needed a way to show the risk in a way that fitted with their mindset of engineering precision. And so, this Aphorism was born giving risk as a Parts per million. This approach and the sacrifice of a child’s finger-sized carrot thankfully ended the discussion.






6 Clubs
To find the most popular exhibit look in the Accident Book

A Science Centre is a safe place for Visitors, but the allure of apparent danger is there in many of the most popular exhibits, The Gyro Chair, The Mirror Maze etc. So, as well as being amongst the most used, these exhibits also figure prominently in the institution’s Accident Book. The decision to keep or retire an exhibit on the grounds of safety is one of the trickiest an exhibition manager has to make.






4 Diamonds
Fixing is different from repairing

Repairing is the same thing each time

Fixing is doing something different,
so that you don't keep on repairing

In a Science Centre that develops its own exhibits, the exhibits become a process, evolving to convey the content better to the Visitor and to become easier to maintain. Although we must be careful that making the exhibit easier to maintain doesn’t harm the learning experience. In one Science Museum I worked with the Maintenance Team would gladly have put every interactive in a glass case with a push-button, just to reduce their workload, 

Often in SC’s where the exhibits are bought-in, it is harder to change the exhibit to work better without voiding some nebulous warranty and so the Visitor experience cannot be improved.






Queen of Diamonds
Fundraising moves money,
it doesn't make money

If you make money from your own activities, if your organisation is profitable, then you decide what you do with that profit. If you rely on funders then they set your goals, and these may not be compatible with your own or with your long-term viability.

So, look every gift horse square in the mouth before accepting their money. Costs are made up of Capital costs, revenue costs, and legacy costs to the organisation.




Thanks are due to the many practitioners whose words I have mangled for my own use, wherever I can I have given credit to them. I also should thank the many institutions around the world that have gainfully employed me and whose experiences, painful and otherwise, I have tried to distill into short, glib, aphorisms.

Thanks are also due to Paul Orselli of POW! and Sherry Marshall of Science Museum Oklahoma, who encouraged me to get this set done, and to Thorsten Kunnemann of Technorama, the Swiss Science Centre who has employed me and given a platform to these aphorisms in the Exploratory Encounters workshops for those developing their own Science Centres and to my wife, Jen, who has had to endure endless versions of these over many, many years.

I hope that you enjoy them and that they help you to develop your plans, but please don’t take them too seriously.

Any corrections or suggestions can be sent to me at harry.white90@ntlworld.com 


AND NOW THE GIVEAWAY!

We'll be giving away 4 prizes to four lucky winners  -- 2 sets of both the first and second Exhibit Aphorisms decks, and 2 individual decks of the winner's choice (either the first or second deck.)

There are two ways to enter the giveaway:

1) Become a subscriber to ExhibiTricks by clicking the link at the top right of the blog's homepage, where it says, "Sign up NOW for Free ExhibiTricks Blog Updates."

2) If you are already a subscriber, then send an email to: info@orselli.net with the subject line, "Aphorisms Deck Giveaway."

Enter by July 5, 2022 to be eligible to win one of the four prizes.  GOOD LUCK!







Don't miss out on any ExhibiTricks posts! It's easy to get updates via email or your favorite news reader. Just click the "Sign up for Free ExhibiTricks Blog Updates" link on the upper right side of the blog.

Paul Orselli writes the posts on ExhibiTricks. Paul likes to combine interesting people, ideas, and materials to make exhibits (and entire museums!) with his company POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) Let's work on a project together!

If you enjoy the blog, you can help keep it free to read and free from ads by supporting ExhibiTricks through our PayPal "Tip Jar"

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

The Exhibit Aphorisms Decks (and a FREE GIVEAWAY!)


A number of years ago, science center consultant extraordinaire Harry White put together a fun way to collect some exhibit wisdom together in a handy, portable package -- the Exhibit Aphorisms decks!

The idea of an aphorism is to put some core truth in a memorably flippant way so that people who are “in the know” recognize it and those who don’t, think about it some more.  

So, the Exhibit Aphorisms decks are just like a standard deck of cards, except the face of each card contains a thought-provoking, exhibit-related saying or quote. 


Here are a few examples:

The first is from Ken Gleason:

The Three Ways an Exhibit Must Work.

1. Attraction
If they don't use it, it can't achieve anything.

2. Function.
It must work, keep working and be safe.

3. Education.
What we're for, and why we're doing it. 1 & 2 lead here.



From Ian Simmons: 

"The Survival of the Dullest"
Good exhibits are popular, get used, and therefore break down.
Dull exhibits don't get used, and so don't break down.
Therefore all interactive exhibitions, without maintenance, eventually tend towards the dull.



Others are shorter and reflect bitter experience:

Sufficient ruggedization of loose parts turns them into weapons.

For every hole or gap, there is a corresponding human limb or appendage to get wedged in it.

Making easy exhibits is difficult.
Making easy exhibits difficult is easy.



Then some come in pairs:

Any component which is ideal, cheap, and universally available will be discontinued by the time the exhibit that uses it is fully developed.

Any component that doesn't exist, so you have to devise it at great cost, will be in the next McMaster-Carr catalog.




Not all are directly about exhibits:

“Nobody flunked a Science Centre.”
Frank Oppenheimer


“The probability of somebody doing the absolutely inconceivable is never exactly zero.”
H. Richard Crane


“Visitors come to a Science Centre because it’s cheaper than the movies and less exhausting than the swimming pool.”
Gillian Thomas



Because the Exhibit Aphorism decks have never formally been for sale, getting hold of a deck has mainly involved running into Harry at a museum conference and asking for one.  (Although word on the street is that a Kickstarter campaign may be starting to introduce an updated Version 1 and a brand new Version 2 of the decks -- so stay tuned!)


But here's your COVID-safe, travel-free chance to win one of two FREE Exhibit Aphorisms decks, because we are doing an 

ExhibiTricks GIVEAWAY!


For your chance to win, simply send an email to info (at) orselli (dot) net with the subject line, "I want an Exhibit Aphorisms deck!" before February 28, 2021.  That's it.  We will randomly select two winners and contact them directly after the 28th.

Good luck, and remember:

"A consultant is a person who borrows your watch and then charges to tell you the time."


Don't miss out on any ExhibiTricks posts! It's easy to get updates via email or your favorite news reader. Just click the "Sign up for Free ExhibiTricks Blog Updates" link on the upper right side of the blog.

Paul Orselli writes the posts on ExhibiTricks. Paul likes to combine interesting people, ideas, and materials to make exhibits (and entire museums!) with his company POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) Let's work on a project together!

If you enjoy the blog, you can help keep it free to read and free from ads by supporting ExhibiTricks through our PayPal "Tip Jar"

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

A Dinner Party Of Ideas


One of my favorite things about museum people is their genuine capacity for sharing --- be it time, information, or expertise. 

One of my favorite things about this blog is the opportunity to give a forum to colleagues through the ongoing interview feature on ExhibiTricks.

After hundreds of entries since I started blogging back in 2007(!) I've built up quite a "back catalog" of posts, including interviews with some of the most talented and thoughtful folks in the museum biz.

You can find their interviews by using the "Search Box" on the right hand side of this page (and searching for the word "interviews" natch!) but I thought I'd highlight a few you may have missed if you're a newer ExhibiTricks reader, or some that are just worth another careful read.

Think of it as a "Dinner Party of Ideas" with some of the coolest museum people in attendance.  Click on one of the dozen names below (in alphabetical order!) to start the flow of ideas and inspiration.

Enjoy!


Sean Duran

Christina Joy Ferwerda

Rachel Hellenga 

Erika Kiessner

Brad Larson

Kathy McLean

Dana Schloss

Nina Simon

Dan Spock

Jason Jay Stevens

Harry White

Lyn Wood


Do you know someone you'd like to see interviewed for the ExhibiTricks blog?  Send me an email with your suggestion(s)!


Don't miss out on any ExhibiTricks posts! It's easy to get updates via email or your favorite news reader. Just click the "Sign up for Free ExhibiTricks Blog Updates" link on the upper right side of the blog.

P.S. If you receive ExhibiTricks via email (or Facebook or LinkedIn) you will need to click HERE to go to the main ExhibiTricks page to make comments or view multimedia features (like videos!)

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Happy ASTC Halloween!



The international "gathering of the clans" of science center folks called the ASTC Annual Conference starts in Fort Worth this Saturday.

Which as my four children have repeatedly reminded me is Halloween.

So here is a great "trick or treat" (without the trick!) opportunity for any intrepid ExhibiTricks readers who will be in Fort Worth --- I've got several decks of Harry White's Exhibit Aphorism cards (kindly provided by Harry)  to give away.  To find out how to snag your own free deck, just keep reading ....

Here's an excerpt from a previous ExhibiTricks interview with Harry about the decks:

Tell us about your card deck of exhibit aphorisms.
In 1996, Techniquest started the UK’s first Masters course in Science Communication based in a Science Centre. It was a great success with students from all around the world, graduates were snapped up by most of the new UK science centres. I taught the Exhibits module, but after a year of PowerPointing them into submission, I felt that it just wasn’t appropriate to teach a degree about informal education, formally. Also, whenever I ran out of material for a session, just saying something deliberately controversial would start a debate that would fill the time and engage the students.

So I started collecting these quotations, jokes and provocations as aphorisms and put 52 of the best/most annoying onto a deck of cards. When the sessions flagged, I’d ask someone to pick a card, read it out and then the group would try and fathom what I was getting at. Most times a heated debate would ensue.

So you’d like some examples. There are over 200 so bear with me and I’ll pick some of the better ones. You may notice I’ve sneaked one in already in italics above.

The first is from Ken Gleason, at one time it was up on the wall in our workshop.

The Three Ways an Exhibit Must Work.
1. Attraction
If they don't use it, it can't achieve anything.

2. Function.
It must work, keep working and be safe.

3. Education.
What we're for, and why we're doing it. 1 & 2 lead here.


And from Ian Simmons
"The Survival of the Dullest"
Good exhibits are popular, get used and therefore break down.
Dull exhibits don't get used, and so don't break down.
Therefore all interactive exhibitions, without maintenance, eventually tend towards the dull.


Others are shorter and reflect bitter experience:

Sufficient ruggedisation of loose parts turns them into weapons.

For every hole or gap there is a corresponding human limb or appendage to get wedged in it.

Making easy exhibits is difficult.
Making easy exhibits difficult is easy.


Then some come in pairs:

Any component which is ideal, cheap and universally available will be discontinued by the time the exhibit that uses it is fully developed.

Any component that doesn't exist, so you have to devise it at great cost, will be in the next RS (McMaster Carr) catalogue.


Not all are about exhibits:

Nobody cares who the Director is.
(As you may imagine this was more forcefully put, the point being that however hard the administration works it’s the people on the front line that the Visitors meet and our job is to support them.)


“Give a visitor a fact and they know one thing,
Give them curiosity and they will learn endless things.”
Ian Russell

“Nobody flunked a Science Centre.”
Frank Oppenheimer


“The probability of somebody doing the absolutely inconceivable is never exactly zero.”
H. Richard Crane

“Visitors come to a Science Centre because it’s cheaper than the movies and less exhausting than the swimming pool.”
Gillian Thomas

You can know the science from a book,
You can know the engineering from experience,
But to find out what it makes people think you have to ask them.


Exhibits are about the phenomena, if the Visitor notices that the design is good, then it’s not good enough

The interactive content of an exhibit is inversely proportional to the area and expense of the graphic surrounding it

And so on, and on and on…………….


The idea of an Aphorism is to put some core truth in a memorably flippant way so that people who are “in the know” recognize it and those who don’t think about it. As an instructional tool this has a fatal flaw in that any one who “gets” it doesn’t need it and those that need it, don’t get it.

So I have started writing explanations of the Aphorisms to go with them. I use them a lot in consulting with other centres because they are memorable and anti-intuitive, a bit like good exhibits really.

A consultant is a person who borrows your watch and then charges to tell you the time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

So, if you'd like a chance to win your own Exhibit Aphorisms deck of cards, just find me on October 31st, hand me your business card, and say "Trick or Treat!"

That's it.  Supplies are limited, but I'll make sure I have a batch to give away for both the A.M. and P.M. to keep things interesting.

Hope to see you in Fort Worth!

Don't miss out on any ExhibiTricks posts! It's easy to get updates via email or your favorite news reader. Just click the "Free Updates" link on the right side of the blog.

P.S. If you receive ExhibiTricks via email you will need to click HERE to go to the main ExhibiTricks page to make comments or view multimedia features (like videos!)

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Our First Contest!




In our recent interview with Harry White ("Science Centre Consultant" at TechniQuest Science Center in Cardiff, Wales) we discussed his card deck of Exhibit Aphorisms.

Harry started collecting these quotations, jokes, and provocations about exhibits and exhibit development to use in a university course in Science Communication based in a Science Centre.

Here are two random examples:

"If they had to read the label the exhibit designer blew it."

"Bad exhibit ideas get more complex, good exhibit ideas get simpler."

I found out at the recent ASTC Conference in Philadelphia that Harry has officially "published" a full deck of 54 cards (52 + 2 Jokers) each with a pithy insight into the exhibit development process on the face.

And now two lucky ExhibiTricks readers will each win one of these limited "first edition" decks. (See picture above.)

Here's how to win: between now and the end of October, simply enter into the "Comments Section" below your favorite quote (either "original" or "borrowed") about the exhibit development process OR become an email subscriber to the ExhibiTricks blog (just use the handy box along the right side of the blog to sign up.) We'll choose one person from the commenters, and one from the new email subscribers, and we'll notify the two winners in the first week of November.

Get started, have fun, and good luck!

Don't miss out on any ExhibiTricks posts! It's easy to subscribe right now via email (or your favorite news reader) with the tools on the right side of the blog.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Museums From The Other Side Of The Pond: An Interview With Harry White

After serving for many years as the Director of Exhibits, Harry White is now the "Science Centre Consultant" at TechniQuest Science Center (also known as TQ) in Cardiff, Wales. I've had the pleasure of visiting Harry in Wales, and I've always been interested in the different take that our museum colleagues in the UK and Europe have on interactive exhibits and science centers (or "centres"!) I thought readers of the ExhibiTricks blog could benefit from Harry's responses to my interview questions:

What’s your academic background?

An electronics degree, a spell as a medical physicist followed by a Masters in Laser Anemometry and 12 years in a university engineering faculty sticking computers on anything that needed it, or often didn’t. Then 23 years in Techniquest. As you can see I’m still waiting for a proper job.


How/Why did you get started in Museums?
I was happily vegetating at the University when a memo came around about some unknown thing called a “Science Centre”. Like any academic faced with the prospect of work, I followed standard procedure and sent a student to the first meeting. She reported back that “They’re mad, you’d fit right in” and the rest is history.


Were you a “science geek” as a kid?
Yes I suppose I was, I have a wonderful aunt who taught mathematics and if you showed an interest in science she would send you expensive Christmas presents. So I was bribed into “geekdom”, but I’m eternally grateful to her for warping my young mind.

A friend and I used to make weedkiller explosives and try them out in the park, another opportunity for enrichment activity taken from our kids by the war on terror.


What new museum trends are you most excited about?
In 2004, I was lucky enough to be able to attend the Exploratorium’s APE workshops. I’m still processing some of that information, but something that resonated with me immediately was the concept of shifting authority to the visitor. It just seems like the next step, on-line we have Wikipedia, why not a WikiScienceCentre?

I took my first steps towards this in Bergen, Norway when I was consulting to create VILVITE in 2006/7. We planned and implemented a personalisation system so that the Visitors could “Do in the Science Centre what the Science Centre does best” ie: provide memorable experiences and then link those experiences on-line to the didactic content that is best done on-line.

In providing information about the exhibits that they had used, we structured it as FAQs and provided five for each exhibit ranging from the standard “Why does that ball stay in the air?” to the deliberately flippant “It’s a nice trick, but why should I care?” If the Visitor has another question they can post it and we will answer it. If the Visitor doesn’t like our answer, then they can post their own. We moderate it and acknowledge their contribution on line. Let’s hope that one day all our original text will be gone and replaced with something far better.



Tell us about your card deck of exhibit aphorisms.
In 1996, Techniquest started the UK’s first Masters course in Science Communication based in a Science Centre. It was a great success with students from all around the world, graduates were snapped up by most of the new UK science centres. I taught the Exhibits module, but after a year of PowerPointing them into submission, I felt that it just wasn’t appropriate to teach a degree about informal education, formally. Also, whenever I ran out of material for a session, just saying something deliberately controversial would start a debate that would fill the time and engage the students.

So I started collecting these quotations, jokes and provocations as aphorisms and put 52 of the best/most annoying onto a deck of cards. When the sessions flagged, I’d ask someone to pick a card, read it out and then the group would try and fathom what I was getting at. Most times a heated debate would ensue.

So you’d like some examples. There are over 200 so bear with me and I’ll pick some of the better ones. You may notice I’ve sneaked one in already in italics above.

The first is from Ken Gleason, at one time it was up on the wall in our workshop.

The Three Ways an Exhibit Must Work.
1. Attraction
If they don't use it, it can't achieve anything.

2. Function.
It must work, keep working and be safe.

3. Education.
What we're for, and why we're doing it. 1 & 2 lead here.


And from Ian Simmons
"The Survival of the Dullest"
Good exhibits are popular, get used and therefore break down.
Dull exhibits don't get used, and so don't break down.
Therefore all interactive exhibitions, without maintenance, eventually tend towards the dull.


Others are shorter and reflect bitter experience:

Sufficient ruggedisation of loose parts turns them into weapons.

For every hole or gap there is a corresponding human limb or appendage to get wedged in it.

Making easy exhibits is difficult.
Making easy exhibits difficult is easy.


Then some come in pairs:

Any component which is ideal, cheap and universally available will be discontinued by the time the exhibit that uses it is fully developed.

Any component that doesn't exist, so you have to devise it at great cost, will be in the next RS (McMaster Carr) catalogue.


Not all are about exhibits:

Nobody cares who the Director is.
(As you may imagine this was more forcefully put, the point being that however hard the administration works it’s the people on the front line that the Visitors meet and our job is to support them.)


“Give a visitor a fact and they know one thing,
Give them curiosity and they will learn endless things.”
Ian Russell

“Nobody flunked a Science Centre.”
Frank Oppenheimer


“The probability of somebody doing the absolutely inconceivable is never exactly zero.”
H. Richard Crane

“Visitors come to a Science Centre because it’s cheaper than the movies and less exhausting than the swimming pool.”
Gillian Thomas

You can know the science from a book,
You can know the engineering from experience,
But to find out what it makes people think you have to ask them.


Exhibits are about the phenomena, if the Visitor notices that the design is good, then it’s not good enough

The interactive content of an exhibit is inversely proportional to the area and expense of the graphic surrounding it

And so on, and on and on…………….


The idea of an Aphorism is to put some core truth in a memorably flippant way so that people who are “in the know” recognize it and those who don’t think about it. As an instructional tool this has a fatal flaw in that any one who “gets” it doesn’t need it and those that need it, don’t get it.

So I have started writing explanations of the Aphorisms to go with them. I use them a lot in consulting with other centres because they are memorable and anti-intuitive, a bit like good exhibits really.

A consultant is a person who borrows your watch and then charges to tell you the time.



Is there a “UK style” of museum exhibits? Is there a TQ “style”?
Short answer is that there used to be, but now I’m not so sure. Pre-millennium the centres were small but had individual identities. The Millennium boom happened so fast and didn’t involve many people who were in the business already and so the centres, with a few noble exceptions, tended to be made by Museum design companies who naturally had an eye on the deadlines and couldn’t take risks or learn from their mistakes. This bred a certain uniformity that upsets the professionally-obsessed science centre geek in me.

The scene is still shaking down and the centres that have survived are developing their own styles but it’s slow, most are expected to break-even operationally and so they don’t have the money to develop exhibits. Because they are all so big, their failures are very public. Techniquest had the great advantage of starting small and making our mistakes when nobody was looking.

Techniquest grew through three phases, each time building on what went before. When it opened in 1995, Techniquest’s third phase was the only purpose-built science centre in the UK and by far the largest. (See photo below.) I was acutely aware that we could go from “those nice people doing great things on a shoestring” to “the people that got all that money and produced a pile of rubbish”. Plus Cardiff has a tendency to underrate itself and it was important that what we did was obviously of quality. “You can’t tell kids ‘Hey!, Science is great, you can do it!, if you had to buy it in.” So I wanted TQ to look like it came from one mind, the design should be good but shouldn’t get in the way of the phenomena.



I love the homebuilt feel of the Exploratorium but that wouldn’t have done for Cardiff. There’s a thin line between “Hey!, I could do that!” which means that you have empowered your visitor and a bad response “Huh! I could have done that myself!” which means your visitor feels they have been fleeced. I deal with this by including what I call “Points of Contact” in exhibits so whilst the exhibit itself is a glossy professional product it might include an item from the kitchen at home, eg. the “Roll Uphill” double cone illusion exhibit uses two kitchen funnels back to back, which means that not only are they recognisable items but the spouts make a good handle.



Can you say a few words about BIG, and the BIG Fabricator's weeks?
BIG, the British Interactive Group, is an ironic name as it represents the individuals who work in the Hands-on business rather than ECSITE and ASTC who represent the big organisations those individuals work for. It’s not a trade union and it’s main activities are centred around the professional development of those working in the interactives field. A group of us, mainly Bhagwant Singh, set it up in the early 90’s when subscriptions to ECSITE were too much for the nascent centres that existed in the UK at that time.

The BIG Fabricators Event grew out of the Nuffield Interactive Science Project led by the remarkable Melanie Quin. These brought famous fabricators, Bernie Zubrowski, Ilan Chabay, Bill Walton and others over for a week to make exhibits assisted by Brits who would learn their trade from them.

BIG’s Fabricator’s week fulfils a similar but different need and allows exhibits people to get together and build a working prototype in a week on a shoestring. I’ve done quite a few and usually I get to try to realise an idea that has been in my mind for sometime. For me, it’s a chance to get around to what, professionally, I won’t ever get around to.



What is the role and relationship (if any) of ECSITE to ASTC?
ECSITE and ASTC work very closely together. Pele Persson was recently chair of ASTC, and Walter Stavelos, ex-ECSITE now works for ASTC. Global projects like IGLO require this close collaboration and so this brings in ASPAC, CASC, Red-Pop etc. as well.

To me it seems that ECSITE has a more diverse membership, perhaps because the US has more organisations like ACM, AAM etc., ASTC just seems, by comparison, more focused on science centres.



What differences do you see in different countries approach (especially in the UK and Europe) toward museums and museum exhibits?
Pele Persson said that “The difference between a science museum and a science centre is a line drawn in water.” Europe generally has more museums and a more collections-based approach but there are also many more science centres opening.

When we took Techniquest’s exhibits to Japan there was a great deal of focus on doing every exhibit thoroughly in turn but the visitors still enjoyed it just as much. Our exhibits worked well for Commquest in the townships of South Africa. In the UAE, the approach is more didactic and focussed on content but everywhere I’ve been, giving control to the Visitor has worked, just in slightly different ways. We’ve sold exhibits in more than 40 countries and no returns as yet.


What can a parent do to encourage a child’s interest in science?
Do it in front of them, get them to join in and bribe them with scientific goodies. Stand up and testify- “I am a science geek!”


Are there fun MATH exhibits?
Yes, definitely some of the best exhibits are maths exhibits.
I did one called Gone Vest which was just a jacket with a very stretchy waistcoat (or vest) to go underneath it. Visitors just followed the cartoon instructions to take the waistcoat off whilst leaving the jacket on. It was really popular, but couldn’t get them to hang the coats up afterwards.

One day I will do the “Monte Carlo” methods for "Pi" exhibit which was in the 1984 Swiss Phenomena book. It’s just a 1 metre Perspex cylinder inside a 1 metre Perspex square column. You throw balls randomly into the assembly and number that fall in the circle divided by the number that fall in the square is Pi/4. The more balls you throw, the more accurate the estimation.

In 1991, the same team did a building called Polyédre which was a Octahedron with hinged corners that opened up into a cube-octahedron with open squares for some sides. The icing on that particular cake was the brass band that played on a hydraulic platform inside the structure.


Other topological puzzles like the halo puzzles in Puzzlequest are endlessly popular and have been copied all over the world.



Was there ever an exhibit you were sure would be a hit that never (or hasn’t yet) taken off?
Well, every one you start you think is going to be a hit, otherwise you wouldn’t start it.

Magnetic Needle, was a big sewing needle’s eye with north pole magnets arranged around it pointing inwards. Around this were threads with a north pole, a south pole, a non-magnetised iron end and a wooden end. I thought it would be interesting to explore the effects, but in the end no one really noticed even though the South pole was pulled out of their hands. We took it off the floor quite quickly and I’m sure my colleagues have moved it toward the skip (dumpster).

There’s an aphorism for that too, of course:
If you can’t stand seeing your exhibit in the skip, you’re in the wrong business.


What’s you favorite museum?
It changes all the time, it would be a bad thing to have just one favourite. The geek in me loves the National Motor Museum, the Robin Opie, Packaging Museum in Gloucester and the Pencil Museum in Cumbria. When I visit the states, I usually enthuse about a Children’s Museum, Acton, San Jose, Indianapolis. Play for its own sake and the breadth of their approach is so liberating.

I also like The ARC in York. After the Jorvik Viking Centre was a big success, the city council passed a bylaw saying that developers had to preserve the contents of building excavations
for archaeological evaluation. This ended up with the Developers having warehouses full of numbered boxes of soil, far more than all the archaeologists in the UK could ever sift through. So Dr. Andrew Jones aka "Jones the Bones" founded the Archeological Resource Centre where the public can sift through the boxes and call a resident archaeologist if they find something interesting. The Visitor is credited with the find and the work gets done.

And of course, the Exploratorium is the spiritual home of the Fabricator in me. The Science Museum of Minnesota and Science North take the lab aspect further than anyone else and then there’s Agents of Change at the OSC. I love them all, my long-suffering wife has to ask the travel agent for countries without a science centre just to get some peace.

As a professional I’m always impressed by novelty and I loved Tehnoannas Pagrabi
(The Technician’s Cellars) in Riga, Latvia. It’s run on a shoe-string by Alvis and Dace Balodi but has wonderful, unique exhibits. For example, a giant birdhouse on the fourth floor, you can sit on a perch and they take the floor away leaving only a steel net between you and the ground 40 feet below, they have knitted exhibits on the solar system and in one part of the loft they had a quite serious fire but thought it looked better afterwards so they lacquered the burnt beams and you can now walk through it.



What’s your favourite science-related experience? (Either as a child or an adult.)
Everytime I switch on something I’ve made and it still works.

In 1966 Professor Eric Laithwaite was invited to do the prestigious Royal Institution Children's Christmas Lectures. These have been given annually since 1852 by famous scientists including Faraday, Tyndall, Bragg etc.

In the first lecture Laithwaite, who developed the linear induction motor and maglev train, showed a large aluminium sphere about 5 feet in diameter and said that throughout the week’s lectures he would construct a levitating coil and make this ball float. The striking point to me being that he had never done this before and he was going to attempt it for the first time ever in front of an audience of 400+ children. This was real science being done for real.




What are the best and worst trends from US exhibit making that have informed your work in the UK?
The best trends that I’ve mentioned already are the APE work and the breadth of the Children’s Museum approach. The worst is a result of the larger market in the US, in that there tends to be a limited number of commercial firms who, in an entirely valid attempt to reduce risk for the customer and give value, tend to repeat what they have done before, so innovation is stifled in the interests of the client. In Europe, the converse happens, I get asked to help with content ideas and then the ideas are given to a design company to build instead of buying them from the original source who know all the subtleties of the exhibit.

To decline the verb to inspire: I am inspired, you copy me, they ripped us off.

Thanks again to Harry White for sharing his ideas and insights with the ExhibiTricks readers!


If you're new to the ExhibiTricks blog, subscribe via email or your favorite news reader with the tools on the right side of the postings!